不同坡度隧道火灾自熄现象试验研究

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.01.027

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 186-191.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.01.027

不同坡度隧道火灾自熄现象试验研究

王钟宽¹, 粟萌萌¹, 黄欣¹, 郑静如¹, 李子豪¹, 王国元^1,2

1 西南交通大学消防工程系,四川成都 611756;
2 成都双流国际机场股份有限公司,四川成都 610202

收稿日期:2020-10-10 修回日期:2020-12-13 出版日期:2021-01-28
作者简介:王钟宽 (1995—),男,河南驻马店人,硕士研究生,研究方向为隧道火灾防治技术。E-mail:254234511@qq.com。

Experimental study on fire self-extinction phenomenon in tunnel with different slopes

WANG Zhongkuan¹, SU Mengmeng¹, HUANG Xin¹, ZHENG Jingru¹, LI Zihao¹, WANG Guoyuan^1,2

1 Department of Fire Protection Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu Sichuan 611756, China;
2 Chengdu Shuangliu International Airport Co., Ltd., Chengdu Sichuan 610202, China

Received:2020-10-10 Revised:2020-12-13 Published:2021-01-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究不同坡度的隧道火灾自熄特性,以美国Memorial隧道为原型,应用Froude准则建立1∶20缩尺隧道模型,在自然通风条件下使用甲醇燃料进行隧道火灾试验,通过数据测量系统获取试验中风速、温度和氧气体积分数数据。结果表明:坡度为3%和5%的隧道火灾试验均未出现自熄现象;无坡度和坡度为1%的隧道中,除热释放速率(HRR)为2.8 kW外的试验均发生自熄现象,且HRR越大,自熄时间越短;隧道坡度的存在,使得热烟气在浮力作用下形成烟囱效应,坡度越大,烟囱效应越强;坡度为3%和5%的隧道中由于形成较大纵向风速,因而火焰不能自熄,坡度较小的隧道由于火源附近氧气体积分数下降至最低氧气体积分数以下,因而发生自熄现象。

关键词: 隧道火灾, 自熄现象, 坡度, 烟囱效应, 自然通风

Abstract: In order to explore self-extinction phenomenon of fire in tunnels with different slopes, with America′s Memorial Tunnel as a prototype, a 1/20 reduced-scale model tunnel was constructed based on Froude scaling law and a series of experiments were conducted by using methanol to investigate fire in tunnels under natural ventilation. Then, information of velocity, temperature and oxygen concentration were obtained through data acquisition system. The results show that there is no self-extinction phenomenon in experiments with a slope of 3% and 5%, while it occurs in cases of zero and 1% slope except when heat release rate(HRR) is at 2.8 kW, and the greater HRR is, the shorter self-extinction takes. Existence of tunnel slopes causes hot smoke to form stack effect due to buoyancy, and the larger slope is, the stronger stack effect will be. As tunnels with a slope of 3% and 5% form larger longitudinal wind speed, they restrain self-extinction while in tunnels with a smaller slope, the phenomenon occurs because oxygen concentration near the fire source has fallen to the limit.

Key words: tunnel fire, fire self-extinction, slope, stack effect, natural ventilation

中图分类号:

X932

王钟宽, 粟萌萌, 黄欣, 郑静如, 李子豪, 王国元. 不同坡度隧道火灾自熄现象试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(1): 186-191.

WANG Zhongkuan, SU Mengmeng, HUANG Xin, ZHENG Jingru, LI Zihao, WANG Guoyuan. Experimental study on fire self-extinction phenomenon in tunnel with different slopes[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(1): 186-191.

参考文献

[1] 王梦恕. 中国铁路、隧道与地下空间发展概况[J]. 隧道建设, 2010, 30(4): 351-364.
WANG Mengshu. An overview of development of railways, tunnels and underground works in China[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2010, 30(4): 351-364.
[2] 胡珉, 刘妼雯. 基于VR的隧道火灾疏散指挥训练系统[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(5): 185-190.
HU Min, LIU Biwen. VR-based tunnel fire evacuation commander training system[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(5): 185-190.
[3] TB10003—2016, 铁路隧道设计规范[S].
TB10003-2016, Code for design of railway tunnel[S].
[4] JTG B01—2014, 公路工程技术标准[S].
JTG B01-2014, Technical standard of highway engineering[S].
[5] CHOW W K, WONG K Y, CHUNG W Y. Longitudinal ventilation for smoke control in a tilted tunnel by scale modeling[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2010, 25(2): 122-128.
[6] GANNOUNI S, MAAD R B. Numerical analysis of smoke dispersion against the wind in a tunnel fire[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2016, 158: 61-68.
[7] LIN Peng, LO S M, LI Tao. Numerical study on the impact of gradient on semi-transverse smoke control system in tunnel[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2014, 44(3): 68-79.
[8] LNNERMARK A, HUGOSSON J, INGASON H. Fire incidents during construction work of tunnels-model scale experiments[R]. SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, 2010.
[9] BAILEY J L, WILLIAMS F W, TATEM P A. Methanol pan fires in an enclosed space: effect of pressure and oxygen concentration[R]. Naval Research Laboratory, 1993.
[10] WANG Kaihong, CHEN Junmin, WANG Zhongkuan, et al. An experimental study on self-extinction of tunnel fire under natural ventilation condition[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 84: 177-188.
[11] LIN Peng, WANG Zhongkuan, WANG Kaihong, et al. An experimental study on self-extinction of methanol fire in tilted tunnel[J/OL]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.102996.
[12] Bechtel/Parsons Brinckerhoff Inc. Memorial tunnel fire ventilation test program (MTFVTP)[R]. Massachusetts Highway Department and Federal Highway Administration, 1995.
[13] INGASON H, LI Yingzhen. Model scale tunnel fire tests with longitudinal ventilation[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2010, 45(6/7/8): 371-384.
[14] JI Jie, FAN Chuangang, ZHONG Wei, et al. Experimental investigation on influence of different transverse fire locations on maximum smoke temperature under the tunnel ceiling[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2012, 55(17/18): 4 817-4 826.
[15] TANG Fei, MEI Fengzhu, WANG Qiang, et al. Maximum temperature beneath the ceiling in tunnel fires with combination of ceiling mechanical smoke extraction and longitudinal ventilation[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2017, 68: 231-237.
[16] GAO Zihe, JI Jie, FAN Chuangang, et al. Influence of sidewall restriction on the maximum ceiling gas temperature of buoyancy-driven thermal flow[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2014, 84: 13-20.
[17] HURLEY M J, GOTTUK D, HALL J R, et al. SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering (fifth edition)[M]. New York: Springer, 2016: 539-541.

不同坡度隧道火灾自熄现象试验研究

Experimental study on fire self-extinction phenomenon in tunnel with different slopes

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王启睿, 姜学鹏, 薛光桥, 钱新博. 我国公路隧道火灾社会风险可接受标准研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(4): 121-127.
[2]	何路, 张晓锦, 王东伟, 朱国庆, 袁狄平, 徐志胜. 隧道火灾集中排烟系统排热效率预测方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(7): 113-120.
[3]	杜涛, 李萍, 王雨, 薛宪凯. 隧道火灾烟气温度及蔓延速度衰减特性[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(2): 140-145.
[4]	张孝春, 陈林杰, 周舸尧, 张兆民, 魏瑞超, 吴斌斌. 耦合烟气与蒙特卡罗的隧道火灾疏散及其优化[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(12): 167-175.
[5]	徐童, 唐飞, 何清. 隧道内贴壁火顶棚射流温度及火焰特性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(7): 93-97.
[6]	阳东, 李萍. 抑制倾斜隧道烟气流动热压主导模式的临界风压[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 41-47.
[7]	杨宇轩, 程辉航, 龙增, 陈俊沣, 刘畅, 钟茂华. 阻塞效应对隧道火灾烟气温度影响试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(10): 135-141.
[8]	陶亮亮, 曾艳华, 刘振撼, 彭俊钦, 周小涵. 空气幕对地铁隧道火灾温度及流场的影响研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 157-163.
[9]	刘雨晴, 张培红. 大坡度倾斜巷道火灾烟气温度分布特征研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(4): 156-162.
[10]	姜学鹏, 陈欣格, 郭昆. 侧部点式排烟隧道火灾临界风速研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(3): 105-111.
[11]	陶亮亮, 王浩然, 刘振撼, 周小涵, 曾艳华. 水幕排烟系统对烟气控制及排烟效率的影响研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 120-126.
[12]	杨小龙, 张玉春, 高云骥, 靳开颜, 李智胜, 李涛. 公路隧道火灾烟气层高度判定方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(4): 147-153.
[13]	马砺, 李超华, 张鹏宇, 邱贤宗, 赵鑫. 封堵比例对隧道火灾顶棚温度分布的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(2): 79-85.
[14]	姜学鹏, 谢智云, 于思维, 廖湘娟. 水下V形坡隧道烟气温度纵向衰减研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(9): 70-76.
[15]	孙少华, 程家骥, 丛北华, 杨万宝. 强制通风对隧道起火影响的全尺寸试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(10): 56-61.